Luminous-Lint - for collectors and connoisseurs of fine photography
HOME  BACKFREE NEWSLETTER

HomeContentsOnline exhibitions > Die Kunst in der Photographie (1897)

Title • Introduction • First image • Lightbox • Checklist • ResourcesPrevious Previous Previous[6 of 42]

 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
Standard
  
  
Unidentified photographer/creator 
Plate Reference Identification for Photogravures published in Die Kunst in Der Photographie 
[Die Kunst in der Photographie] 
n.d. 
  
Photoseed 
Photograph courtesy PhotoSeed.com 
  
 
LL/15695 
  
The following are some general notations regarding locations for typographic attribution and style on individual plates in Die Kunst in der Photographie (1897-1908). The original size of the large plate photogravures in this publication averages about 35 x 26 cm but there are always variances depending on the publisher of the work and available paper stock at the appropriate atelier at the time of printing. Most of the plates in Die Kunst in der Photographie were printed on white or off-white plate paper. There are also many superb examples of Chine-collé photogravures in the run of Die Kunst in der Photographie. 1897 features no less than 26 Chine-collé plates: perhaps the finest method of bringing out detail in the copper plates themselves. In later years, some of the photogravures were printed on hand-made laid paper with the Van Gelder Zonen watermark.
 
The following is a guide for identifying marks on Die Kunst in der Photographie photogravure plates (1897-1908)
 
1. The name of the publication Die Kunst in der Photographie and almost always the date is printed in the upper left hand corner of the photogravure impression.
 
2. The publisher of record for the photogravure is printed in the upper right hand corner of the photogravure impression. The order of publishers for Die Kunst in der Photographie is: 1897-1899: Julius Becker, Berlin; 1900: Martin Oldenbourg, Berlin; 1901-1908: Wilhelm Knapp, Halle a.S. Note: The six Blechinger & Leykauf plates in 1897 carry the publisher imprint for Verlag v. W. Pauli's Nachf. (H. Jerosch) Berlin. Presumably, Julius Becker or Goerke himself had a prior business arrangement with this Berlin publisher at the inception of the publication. The imprint for Julius Becker begins to appear starting with photogravures in folio #2.
 
3. At lower left corner border of photogravure impression is printed the author attribution of the work. Sometimes a date for when the photograph was taken is also printed. A country or place of origin (city or town) also appears here at times. Another mark that appears is fec, an abbreviation for faciebat, which indicates works where the artist has prepared the plate and printed it.
 
4. At the lower right corner border of the photogravure impression is printed the atelier that was involved in the production of the photogravure itself. Here, the Krauss article states: "The company name, where given, is mostly preceded by "hel. & imp.", meaning "heliographed and printed (by)'. This refers to the two totally separate processes: the preparation (etching and other procedures) of the printing plates, and the printing itself. Ordinarily, in any high quality establishment, these were actually carried out under the supervision of a single management..." (274) For the record, Krauss also conducted a review of all of the 356 gravures in this publication (14 of the plates were missing and could not be located) and he determined that 28 had no atelier imprint at all. In regards to the business end of producing hand-pulled photogravures, it should be noted that there are many variables at work. The realities of economics are mentioned by Krauss, and he gives his suspicions for the absence of certain atelier imprints: "We can only speculate about the fact that Meisenbach, Riffarth made none of the plates in 1899 and 1900, and Buxenstein (George Buxenstein-Berlin) all of them. Perhaps one firm was played off against the other, in order to achive lower prices. Even the fact that 17 out of 20 photogravures in 1905 bear no imprint at all may have had economic reasons. Maybe establishments of less renown were tried, which would almost certainly be cheaper than the more famous ones." (277-278) The fact that photogravure production then and now is an extremely expensive process obviously did play a part in the history of this publication.
 
5. The title of the photograph is in capital letters and centered beneath the photogravure impression. 
 
 
  

Getting around

 

Photographer: 
  
Unidentified photographer/creator
Related online exhibition: 
  
Die Kunst in der Photographie (1897) 
Title | Lightbox | Checklist
Social media: 
  

 
  
HomeContentsVisual indexesThemesPictorialism > Die Kunst in der Photographie (1897) 
  
Portrait 
LL/15639
Portrait 
LL/15640
Portrait 
LL/15641
Portrait 
LL/15642
Portrait 
LL/15643
Portrait 
LL/15644
Portrait 
LL/15645
Portrait 
LL/15646
Portrait 
LL/15647
Portrait 
LL/15648
Portrait 
LL/21173
Portrait 
LL/15649
Portrait 
LL/15791
Portrait 
LL/15650
Portrait 
LL/15695
Portrait 
LL/15651
Portrait 
LL/15652
Portrait 
LL/15653
Portrait 
LL/15654
Portrait 
LL/15655
Portrait 
LL/15656
Portrait 
LL/15657
Portrait 
LL/15658
Portrait 
LL/15659
Portrait 
LL/15660
Portrait 
LL/15661
Portrait 
LL/15662
Portrait 
LL/15663
Portrait 
LL/15664
Portrait 
LL/15665
Portrait 
LL/15666
Portrait 
LL/15667
Portrait 
LL/15668
Portrait 
LL/15669
Portrait 
LL/15670
Portrait 
LL/15671
Portrait 
LL/15672
Portrait 
LL/15673
Portrait 
LL/15674
Portrait 
LL/15675
Portrait 
LL/15676
Portrait 
LL/15677
Portrait 
LL/15678
Portrait 
LL/15679
Portrait 
LL/15680
Portrait 
LL/15681
Portrait 
LL/15682
Portrait 
LL/15683
Portrait 
LL/15684
Portrait 
LL/15685
Portrait 
LL/15686
   

Checklist   


 
  
 
  
Title • Introduction • First image • Lightbox • Checklist • ResourcesPrevious Previous Previous[6 of 42]
 
 
 
  
 
  
HOME  BACKFREE NEWSLETTER